Difference between revisions of "12/12-13/05"
From Metadata-Registry
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
C. Questions | C. Questions | ||
#How to we determine the interactions between the MMS and the RDF datastore maintained by Siderian? | #How to we determine the interactions between the MMS and the RDF datastore maintained by Siderian? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Jon would like to spend about an hour discussing the NSDL Registry project. |
Revision as of 15:48, 10 December 2005
Agenda & Notes: Meeting, Dec. 12-13, 2005, Jacksonville, NY
Agenda, Monday
A. What are our goals for the meeting?
- Resurrect the MMS for the use of GEM and other partners
- Provide GEM with a working metadata management system allowing easier ingest and exposure of data and expansion of reach
- Harvest and evaluate UIUC-IMLS data for possible integration with GEM (in time for inclusion into IMLS grant)
- Possible sustainability option for IMLS data and DLESE?
- Determine
- What pieces of the overall project will be funded by whom
- What timelines and deliverables will be needed to move forward efficiently and sensibly, and satisfy our various constituencies
- Who we will need to collaborate with and how we will manage that collaboration
B. Review Re-implementing the MMS
- Determine if steps and timelines are appropriate
- How much will we be implementing for GEM and how much for IMLS? Where is the line?
- Determine where partner interaction occurs
- How much interaction will be needed with GEM data partners and who will do it?
C. Questions
- How to we determine the interactions between the MMS and the RDF datastore maintained by Siderian?
Jon would like to spend about an hour discussing the NSDL Registry project.