Difference between revisions of "Apr. 2, 2007"
From Metadata-Registry
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
2. Review of Progress, Extension proposal | 2. Review of Progress, Extension proposal | ||
* Narrative nearing completion? | * Narrative nearing completion? | ||
| + | * Should we include some screenshots? | ||
** 1-page summary for FastLane (Stuart) | ** 1-page summary for FastLane (Stuart) | ||
* Budget? | * Budget? | ||
Revision as of 07:57, 2 April 2007
Agenda & Notes, April 2, 2007
1. Review of Progress, New Proposal:
- Pin generation (links proposals in FastLane)
- Narrative complete?
- Budget
- Characterizing CUL work
- Where to get money for ongoing computer maintenance? Should we split costs between proposals?
- Justification
- Support letters
- iVia letter received
- Bill Arms letter on the way
- Requests sent to Laura Bartolo, Stuart Chalk, Kim Lightle (will follow up this week)
- Others? Diny?
2. Review of Progress, Extension proposal
- Narrative nearing completion?
- Should we include some screenshots?
- 1-page summary for FastLane (Stuart)
- Budget?
- Justification
- Support letters, do we need them? How many?
- We'd thought about asking Tom Baker--any others? Alistair?
- Letter from Stuart supporting unfunded collaboration (advisor)
3. DCAM issues
- Issue of "Abstract syntax" vs. "Abstract model" brought up by Alistair on 2/26
