Difference between revisions of "Apr. 2, 2007"

From Metadata-Registry
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
1. Review of Progress, New Proposal:
 
1. Review of Progress, New Proposal:
* Narrative complete?
+
* Pin generation (links proposals in FastLane)
* Budget?
+
* Narrative complete (done)
 +
** Summary
 +
** Narrative
 +
** References
 +
* Budget
 +
** Characterizing CUL work
 +
** Where to get money for ongoing computer maintenance? Should we split costs between proposals? [Yes, include all costs on both budget]
 +
** Justification
 
* Support letters
 
* Support letters
** iVia letter expected soon
+
** iVia letter received
** Requests sent to Laura Bartolo, Stuart Chalk, Kim Lightle, Bill Arms
+
** Bill Arms letter on the way
** Others? Diny?  
+
** Requests sent to Laura Bartolo, Stuart Chalk, Kim Lightle (will follow up this week)
 +
** Others? Diny? [Stuart will draft and ask for letterhead]
 +
* [Need current and pending support: these two proposals and existing proposals]
 +
* [Have bios done]
  
 
2. Review of Progress, Extension proposal
 
2. Review of Progress, Extension proposal
 
* Narrative nearing completion?
 
* Narrative nearing completion?
 +
* Should we include some screenshots?
 +
** 1-page summary for FastLane (Stuart)
 
* Budget?
 
* Budget?
* Support letters, do we need them?  How many?
+
** Diane will start that based on new proposal budget
** We'd thought about asking Tom Baker--any others?
+
** Justification [need to include bracked actual cost at the end of the paragraph]
 +
* Support letters, do we need them?  How many?  
 +
** We'd thought about asking Tom Baker--any others? Alistair? [Diane will ask both of them]
 +
** Letter from Stuart supporting unfunded collaboration (advisor)
 +
 
 +
3. DCAM issues
 +
* Issue of "Abstract syntax" vs. "Abstract model" brought up by [http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0702&L=DC-ARCHITECTURE&P=R5148&I=-3 Alistair on 2/26]

Latest revision as of 08:41, 2 April 2007

Agenda & Notes, April 2, 2007

1. Review of Progress, New Proposal:

  • Pin generation (links proposals in FastLane)
  • Narrative complete (done)
    • Summary
    • Narrative
    • References
  • Budget
    • Characterizing CUL work
    • Where to get money for ongoing computer maintenance? Should we split costs between proposals? [Yes, include all costs on both budget]
    • Justification
  • Support letters
    • iVia letter received
    • Bill Arms letter on the way
    • Requests sent to Laura Bartolo, Stuart Chalk, Kim Lightle (will follow up this week)
    • Others? Diny? [Stuart will draft and ask for letterhead]
  • [Need current and pending support: these two proposals and existing proposals]
  • [Have bios done]

2. Review of Progress, Extension proposal

  • Narrative nearing completion?
  • Should we include some screenshots?
    • 1-page summary for FastLane (Stuart)
  • Budget?
    • Diane will start that based on new proposal budget
    • Justification [need to include bracked actual cost at the end of the paragraph]
  • Support letters, do we need them? How many?
    • We'd thought about asking Tom Baker--any others? Alistair? [Diane will ask both of them]
    • Letter from Stuart supporting unfunded collaboration (advisor)

3. DCAM issues

  • Issue of "Abstract syntax" vs. "Abstract model" brought up by Alistair on 2/26