Difference between revisions of "Apr. 2, 2007"
From Metadata-Registry
(→Agenda & Notes, April 2, 2007) |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
1. Review of Progress, New Proposal: | 1. Review of Progress, New Proposal: | ||
* Pin generation (links proposals in FastLane) | * Pin generation (links proposals in FastLane) | ||
− | * Narrative complete | + | * Narrative complete (done) |
− | * Budget | + | ** Summary |
+ | ** Narrative | ||
+ | ** References | ||
+ | * Budget | ||
** Characterizing CUL work | ** Characterizing CUL work | ||
+ | ** Where to get money for ongoing computer maintenance? Should we split costs between proposals? [Yes, include all costs on both budget] | ||
+ | ** Justification | ||
* Support letters | * Support letters | ||
− | ** iVia letter | + | ** iVia letter received |
− | ** Requests sent to Laura Bartolo, Stuart Chalk, Kim Lightle | + | ** Bill Arms letter on the way |
− | ** Others? Diny? | + | ** Requests sent to Laura Bartolo, Stuart Chalk, Kim Lightle (will follow up this week) |
+ | ** Others? Diny? [Stuart will draft and ask for letterhead] | ||
+ | * [Need current and pending support: these two proposals and existing proposals] | ||
+ | * [Have bios done] | ||
2. Review of Progress, Extension proposal | 2. Review of Progress, Extension proposal | ||
* Narrative nearing completion? | * Narrative nearing completion? | ||
− | ** 1-page summary for FastLane | + | * Should we include some screenshots? |
+ | ** 1-page summary for FastLane (Stuart) | ||
* Budget? | * Budget? | ||
− | * Support letters, do we need them? How many? | + | ** Diane will start that based on new proposal budget |
− | ** We'd thought about asking Tom Baker--any others? | + | ** Justification [need to include bracked actual cost at the end of the paragraph] |
+ | * Support letters, do we need them? How many? | ||
+ | ** We'd thought about asking Tom Baker--any others? Alistair? [Diane will ask both of them] | ||
** Letter from Stuart supporting unfunded collaboration (advisor) | ** Letter from Stuart supporting unfunded collaboration (advisor) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. DCAM issues | ||
+ | * Issue of "Abstract syntax" vs. "Abstract model" brought up by [http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0702&L=DC-ARCHITECTURE&P=R5148&I=-3 Alistair on 2/26] |
Latest revision as of 08:41, 2 April 2007
Agenda & Notes, April 2, 2007
1. Review of Progress, New Proposal:
- Pin generation (links proposals in FastLane)
- Narrative complete (done)
- Summary
- Narrative
- References
- Budget
- Characterizing CUL work
- Where to get money for ongoing computer maintenance? Should we split costs between proposals? [Yes, include all costs on both budget]
- Justification
- Support letters
- iVia letter received
- Bill Arms letter on the way
- Requests sent to Laura Bartolo, Stuart Chalk, Kim Lightle (will follow up this week)
- Others? Diny? [Stuart will draft and ask for letterhead]
- [Need current and pending support: these two proposals and existing proposals]
- [Have bios done]
2. Review of Progress, Extension proposal
- Narrative nearing completion?
- Should we include some screenshots?
- 1-page summary for FastLane (Stuart)
- Budget?
- Diane will start that based on new proposal budget
- Justification [need to include bracked actual cost at the end of the paragraph]
- Support letters, do we need them? How many?
- We'd thought about asking Tom Baker--any others? Alistair? [Diane will ask both of them]
- Letter from Stuart supporting unfunded collaboration (advisor)
3. DCAM issues
- Issue of "Abstract syntax" vs. "Abstract model" brought up by Alistair on 2/26