Difference between revisions of "Apr. 2, 2007"

From Metadata-Registry
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
3. DCAM issues
 
3. DCAM issues
 +
* Issue of "Abstract syntax" vs. "Abstract model" brought up by [http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0702&L=DC-ARCHITECTURE&P=R5148&I=-3 Alistair on 2/26]

Revision as of 07:56, 2 April 2007

Agenda & Notes, April 2, 2007

1. Review of Progress, New Proposal:

  • Pin generation (links proposals in FastLane)
  • Narrative complete?
  • Budget
    • Characterizing CUL work
    • Where to get money for ongoing computer maintenance? Should we split costs between proposals?
    • Justification
  • Support letters
    • iVia letter received
    • Bill Arms letter on the way
    • Requests sent to Laura Bartolo, Stuart Chalk, Kim Lightle (will follow up this week)
    • Others? Diny?

2. Review of Progress, Extension proposal

  • Narrative nearing completion?
    • 1-page summary for FastLane (Stuart)
  • Budget?
    • Justification
  • Support letters, do we need them? How many?
    • We'd thought about asking Tom Baker--any others? Alistair?
    • Letter from Stuart supporting unfunded collaboration (advisor)

3. DCAM issues

  • Issue of "Abstract syntax" vs. "Abstract model" brought up by Alistair on 2/26