Apr. 2, 2007
From Metadata-Registry
Agenda & Notes, April 2, 2007
1. Review of Progress, New Proposal:
- Pin generation (links proposals in FastLane)
- Narrative complete (done)
- Summary
- Narrative
- References
- Budget
- Characterizing CUL work
- Where to get money for ongoing computer maintenance? Should we split costs between proposals? [Yes, include all costs on both budget]
- Justification
- Support letters
- iVia letter received
- Bill Arms letter on the way
- Requests sent to Laura Bartolo, Stuart Chalk, Kim Lightle (will follow up this week)
- Others? Diny? [Stuart will draft and ask for letterhead]
- [Need current and pending support: these two proposals and existing proposals]
- [Have bios done]
2. Review of Progress, Extension proposal
- Narrative nearing completion?
- Should we include some screenshots?
- 1-page summary for FastLane (Stuart)
- Budget?
- Diane will start that based on new proposal budget
- Justification [need to include bracked actual cost at the end of the paragraph]
- Support letters, do we need them? How many?
- We'd thought about asking Tom Baker--any others? Alistair?
- Letter from Stuart supporting unfunded collaboration (advisor)
3. DCAM issues
- Issue of "Abstract syntax" vs. "Abstract model" brought up by Alistair on 2/26