Difference between revisions of "Apr. 5, 2006"

From Metadata-Registry
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Agenda and Notes, April 5, 2006==
 
==Agenda and Notes, April 5, 2006==
  
1. UIUC contract
+
1. UIUC contract  
 +
* Quick review of where we are, what still needs action on our part
 +
* Anything new on the money?
  
 
2. Registry screenshots (Jon will distribute prior to the meeting)
 
2. Registry screenshots (Jon will distribute prior to the meeting)
  
 
3. New version document (Stuart has distributed)
 
3. New version document (Stuart has distributed)
 +
* Question: What criteria should we use to determine how we will decide among options?
 +
** Possible criteria: Whether software can make the distinction (given that reliance on humans, particularly untrained ones, is problematic)?
 +
** Possible criteria: Whether the additional complexity enables a useful service to be created (if not, is purity or completeness sufficient reason)?
 +
* Question: Is the ability for users to see previous versions (and perhaps view "diffs") a reasonable substitute for the complex typed tracking options, such as Melanie describes?
  
 
4. Registry demo at UB meeting
 
4. Registry demo at UB meeting
 
* What should it include?
 
* What should it include?
* Is live important?
+
* Is a live demo important?
 
* How important will it be to demonstrate versioning?
 
* How important will it be to demonstrate versioning?

Revision as of 10:35, 5 April 2006

Agenda and Notes, April 5, 2006

1. UIUC contract

  • Quick review of where we are, what still needs action on our part
  • Anything new on the money?

2. Registry screenshots (Jon will distribute prior to the meeting)

3. New version document (Stuart has distributed)

  • Question: What criteria should we use to determine how we will decide among options?
    • Possible criteria: Whether software can make the distinction (given that reliance on humans, particularly untrained ones, is problematic)?
    • Possible criteria: Whether the additional complexity enables a useful service to be created (if not, is purity or completeness sufficient reason)?
  • Question: Is the ability for users to see previous versions (and perhaps view "diffs") a reasonable substitute for the complex typed tracking options, such as Melanie describes?

4. Registry demo at UB meeting

  • What should it include?
  • Is a live demo important?
  • How important will it be to demonstrate versioning?