Difference between revisions of "Dec. 10, 2007"

From Metadata-Registry
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: === Agenda & Notes, Monday, Dec. 10, 2007 === #The LC Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control put out their [http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/draft-report.html re...)
 
 
Line 28: Line 28:
 
   
 
   
 
The Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) is currently accepting grant applications to the
 
The Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) is currently accepting grant applications to the
 
+
 
 +
Now in their 10th year, National Leadership Grants have supported the innovative  
 
thinking necessary to help libraries and museums meet the changing needs of the American public.   
 
thinking necessary to help libraries and museums meet the changing needs of the American public.   
 
More information about the National Leadership Grant program, including Applications, guidelines,  
 
More information about the National Leadership Grant program, including Applications, guidelines,  
Line 34: Line 35:
 
<http://www.imls.gov/applicants/grants/nationalLeadership.shtm>http://www.imls.gov/applicants/grants/nationalLeadership.shtm
 
<http://www.imls.gov/applicants/grants/nationalLeadership.shtm>http://www.imls.gov/applicants/grants/nationalLeadership.shtm
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
 +
 +
Question:  Are we interested? We have talked a few times about redoing that proposal, but with no decision made.  It might be worth talking to them, but maybe not on this cattle call?
 +
#Other topics?

Latest revision as of 08:32, 10 December 2007

Agenda & Notes, Monday, Dec. 10, 2007

  1. The LC Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control put out their report, which has some interesting implications for both of our NSF proposals in progress. Diane has posted an extensive comment to the report on Google Docs.
  2. We think we have our first funder for the DCMI/RDA Task Group work: Brad Allen of Siderean. We're working on a list of perks that funders can use to justify their bucks.
  3. I got the following email from IMLS:

Question: Are we interested? We have talked a few times about redoing that proposal, but with no decision made. It might be worth talking to them, but maybe not on this cattle call?

  1. Other topics?