Difference between revisions of "F2F Meeting, 1/24-25/07, Seattle"
From Metadata-Registry
(→NSDL Registry Extension Proposal) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Extensions to functionality | * Extensions to functionality | ||
** Application profile (including RDF encoding?) | ** Application profile (including RDF encoding?) | ||
| − | ** Distributed registry | + | ** Distributed registry, including published API |
| + | ** Distributable software for other registry activities | ||
** Developing crosswalks between audience and educational resource type vocabularies for NSDL | ** Developing crosswalks between audience and educational resource type vocabularies for NSDL | ||
* New partnerships? | * New partnerships? | ||
Latest revision as of 08:08, 3 February 2007
Contents
Agenda & Notes, F2F Meeting in Seattle, January 24-25, 2007
NSDL Registry Extension Proposal
- Assumptions about what will be complete by Sept. 2007
- Extensions to functionality
- Application profile (including RDF encoding?)
- Distributed registry, including published API
- Distributable software for other registry activities
- Developing crosswalks between audience and educational resource type vocabularies for NSDL
- New partnerships?
- Administration
- Stuart as advisor
- Diane as PI
NSDL Metadata Services Proposal (New)
- The role of CU Library
- Building the MMS
- The ASN piece
- Administration
- Stuart and Diane as Co-PIs
- UW as "collaborator"
- Cornell as principle
Notes
- Meaning of "continuing" in the solicitation
- Integration of Liddy's SAT
- Do diagram (cloud)
- Terminology services
- Normalization
- Harvesting Management
- iVia
- CNLP SAT
Thursday Agenda
- Project Timelines
- Proposal timelines
- Drafting assignments
- Graphic assignments
- Technical budget needs for redundancy and sysadmin services
