Difference between revisions of "F2F Meeting, 4/27/06, Seattle"

From Metadata-Registry
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Meeting Agenda and Notes, 4/27/06, Seattle)
m (Meeting Agenda and Notes, 4/27/06, Seattle)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
2. Diane and Jon's role in re-enabling GEM data collection and augmentation
 
2. Diane and Jon's role in re-enabling GEM data collection and augmentation
  
* Do we need a formal contract?  If so, what are it's components?
 
 
* Budget expectations?
 
* Budget expectations?
 
* Assistance needs?
 
* Assistance needs?
 +
* Do we need a formal contract?  If so, what are it's components?
  
 
3. GEM cataloging/augmentation services
 
3. GEM cataloging/augmentation services
  
 
* How will they operate?
 
* How will they operate?
** Short-term
+
** Short-term (Immediate needs)
 +
*** Current Consortium Members needing update (GEM XML schema or GEM RDF/XML schema)
 +
*** NEA affilliates--Kentucky
 
** Long-term
 
** Long-term
 
* Who will run them?
 
* Who will run them?
 +
** Short-term
 +
** Long-term
 
* What tools will they need?
 
* What tools will they need?
 +
** Short-term
 +
** Long-term

Revision as of 16:52, 26 April 2006

Meeting Agenda and Notes, 4/27/06, Seattle

1. Planning for Metadata Management System integration with GEM data

  • Report on Wednesday meeting with Jon, Ryan, and Damon

2. Diane and Jon's role in re-enabling GEM data collection and augmentation

  • Budget expectations?
  • Assistance needs?
  • Do we need a formal contract? If so, what are it's components?

3. GEM cataloging/augmentation services

  • How will they operate?
    • Short-term (Immediate needs)
      • Current Consortium Members needing update (GEM XML schema or GEM RDF/XML schema)
      • NEA affilliates--Kentucky
    • Long-term
  • Who will run them?
    • Short-term
    • Long-term
  • What tools will they need?
    • Short-term
    • Long-term