Difference between revisions of "F2F Meeting, 4/27/06, Seattle"
From Metadata-Registry
(→Meeting Agenda and Notes, 4/27/06, Seattle) |
m (→Meeting Agenda and Notes, 4/27/06, Seattle) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* How will they operate? | * How will they operate? | ||
** Short-term (Immediate needs) | ** Short-term (Immediate needs) | ||
| − | *** Current Consortium Members needing update (GEM XML schema or GEM RDF/XML schema) | + | *** Current Consortium Members needing update (GEM XML schema (new) or GEM RDF/XML schema) |
*** NEA affilliates--Kentucky & Connecticut | *** NEA affilliates--Kentucky & Connecticut | ||
** Long-term | ** Long-term | ||
Revision as of 17:59, 26 April 2006
Meeting Agenda and Notes, 4/27/06, Seattle
1. Planning for Metadata Management System integration with GEM data
- Report on Wednesday meeting with Jon, Ryan, and Damon
2. Diane and Jon's role in re-enabling GEM data collection and augmentation
- Budget expectations?
- Assistance needs?
- Do we need a formal contract? If so, what are it's components?
3. GEM cataloging/augmentation services
- How will they operate?
- Short-term (Immediate needs)
- Current Consortium Members needing update (GEM XML schema (new) or GEM RDF/XML schema)
- NEA affilliates--Kentucky & Connecticut
- Long-term
- Short-term (Immediate needs)
- Who will run them?
- Short-term
- Long-term
- What tools will they need?
- Short-term
- Long-term
