Difference between revisions of "F2F Meeting, 4/27/06, Seattle"
From Metadata-Registry
m (→Meeting Agenda and Notes, 4/27/06, Seattle) |
(→Meeting Agenda and Notes, 4/27/06, Seattle) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
** Short-term (Immediate needs) | ** Short-term (Immediate needs) | ||
*** Current Consortium Members needing update (GEM XML schema or GEM RDF/XML schema) | *** Current Consortium Members needing update (GEM XML schema or GEM RDF/XML schema) | ||
| − | *** NEA affilliates--Kentucky | + | *** NEA affilliates--Kentucky & Connecticut |
** Long-term | ** Long-term | ||
* Who will run them? | * Who will run them? | ||
Revision as of 16:53, 26 April 2006
Meeting Agenda and Notes, 4/27/06, Seattle
1. Planning for Metadata Management System integration with GEM data
- Report on Wednesday meeting with Jon, Ryan, and Damon
2. Diane and Jon's role in re-enabling GEM data collection and augmentation
- Budget expectations?
- Assistance needs?
- Do we need a formal contract? If so, what are it's components?
3. GEM cataloging/augmentation services
- How will they operate?
- Short-term (Immediate needs)
- Current Consortium Members needing update (GEM XML schema or GEM RDF/XML schema)
- NEA affilliates--Kentucky & Connecticut
- Long-term
- Short-term (Immediate needs)
- Who will run them?
- Short-term
- Long-term
- What tools will they need?
- Short-term
- Long-term
