Difference between revisions of "F2F Meeting, 4/28/06, Seattle"

From Metadata-Registry
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 20: Line 20:
 
4. Joe's role with the project (should he choose to have one!)
 
4. Joe's role with the project (should he choose to have one!)
  
5.
+
5. Technical Issues:
 +
 
 +
* The URI issue: Should we use our own domain or purl.org?
 +
* The hash/slash issue (Jon)

Revision as of 13:51, 13 April 2006

Registry Project Meeting, Seattle, 4/28/06

1. Review of current work and progress

  • Infrastructure, interfaces, data, testing
  • Plans for demo to DC UB

2. General open questions and issues:

  • How do we deal with the Super Properties? For instance, do we allow people to add things labelled as "Notes" or do we require them to choose among the subproperties (definition, changeNote, etc.)
  • Is historyNote a good place to put term sources, such as we've defined in the NSDL Learning Resource Type vocabulary? We're thinking that the use of skos:inScheme should wait until we do term mapping.
  • In the NSDL vocabularies, we've listed the sources of definitions but there's no place to put those in skos. We're thinking it might be a something we should propose?

3. Versioning issues:

  • Melanie's paper on Versioning
  • Differences between "history" and "version" and how this translates into user services
  • Representing both history and version in the user interface

4. Joe's role with the project (should he choose to have one!)

5. Technical Issues:

  • The URI issue: Should we use our own domain or purl.org?
  • The hash/slash issue (Jon)