Difference between revisions of "May 17, 2006"
From Metadata-Registry
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
** Metadata Schemas are sets of terms and definitions thereof (like a vocabulary) | ** Metadata Schemas are sets of terms and definitions thereof (like a vocabulary) | ||
** Application Profiles use terms from schemas, and descriptions of usage, without being able to change definitions or create new terms | ** Application Profiles use terms from schemas, and descriptions of usage, without being able to change definitions or create new terms | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Review UB meeting progress. Questions: | ||
+ | ** Should we move ahead to specify properties for Metadata Schemas and Application Profiles (using our best guess of UB will come up with)? | ||
+ | ** Should we then register these properties as ours, and prepare to crosswalk to the UB set when that becomes possible? | ||
+ | ** If we don't do this, what are our options? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Review |
Revision as of 11:54, 8 May 2006
Agenda and Notes, May 17, 2006
- Differences between Metadata Schemas and Application Profiles:
- Metadata Schemas are sets of terms and definitions thereof (like a vocabulary)
- Application Profiles use terms from schemas, and descriptions of usage, without being able to change definitions or create new terms
- Review UB meeting progress. Questions:
- Should we move ahead to specify properties for Metadata Schemas and Application Profiles (using our best guess of UB will come up with)?
- Should we then register these properties as ours, and prepare to crosswalk to the UB set when that becomes possible?
- If we don't do this, what are our options?
- Review