Difference between revisions of "May 24, 2006"
From Metadata-Registry
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
** If we '''don't''' do this, what are our options for continuing to develop the Registry? | ** If we '''don't''' do this, what are our options for continuing to develop the Registry? | ||
*** Diane will distribute a spreadsheet suggesting some properties we might register | *** Diane will distribute a spreadsheet suggesting some properties we might register | ||
+ | ** Aren't we just creating an application profile of an application profile? (for which we'll need repeatability) | ||
* Review of Issues we might want to bring up with SKOS | * Review of Issues we might want to bring up with SKOS | ||
− | ** Our versioning policy? (as discussed in Seattle, but not really written up very well yet) | + | ** Our versioning policy? (as discussed in [http://metadataregistry.org/wiki/index.php/F2F_Meeting%2C_4/28/06%2C_Seattle Seattle], but not really written up very well yet) |
+ | ** Sources of definitions? | ||
** Status | ** Status | ||
** What else? | ** What else? |
Revision as of 08:14, 24 May 2006
Agenda and Notes, May 24, 2006
- Differences between Metadata Schemas and Application Profiles:
- Metadata Schemas are sets of terms and definitions thereof (like a vocabulary)
- Application Profiles use terms from schemas, and descriptions of usage, without being able to change definitions or create new terms
- Review UB meeting progress. Questions:
- Should we move ahead to specify vocabularies/properties for Metadata Schemas and Application Profiles (using our best guess of UB will come up with)?
- Should we then register these properties as ours, and prepare to crosswalk to the UB set when that becomes possible? What's the downside of doing this?
- If we don't do this, what are our options for continuing to develop the Registry?
- Diane will distribute a spreadsheet suggesting some properties we might register
- Aren't we just creating an application profile of an application profile? (for which we'll need repeatability)
- Review of Issues we might want to bring up with SKOS
- Our versioning policy? (as discussed in Seattle, but not really written up very well yet)
- Sources of definitions?
- Status
- What else?
- Review current status of Registry progress
- Review Timetables and deliverables for the remainder of the summer