Difference between revisions of "May 24, 2006"
From Metadata-Registry
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
** Metadata Schemas are sets of terms and definitions thereof (like a vocabulary) | ** Metadata Schemas are sets of terms and definitions thereof (like a vocabulary) | ||
** Application Profiles use terms from schemas, and descriptions of usage, without being able to change definitions or create new terms | ** Application Profiles use terms from schemas, and descriptions of usage, without being able to change definitions or create new terms | ||
+ | *** AP has no control over the governance of the schema used | ||
* Review UB meeting progress. Questions: | * Review UB meeting progress. Questions: | ||
Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
*** Diane will distribute a spreadsheet suggesting some properties we might register | *** Diane will distribute a spreadsheet suggesting some properties we might register | ||
** Aren't we just creating an application profile of an application profile? (for which we'll need repeatability) | ** Aren't we just creating an application profile of an application profile? (for which we'll need repeatability) | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Consensus:''' We will register the first three (agents, top level vocabs, vocabulary extras) and see whether Tom is okay with us being the bleeding edge. | ||
* Review of Issues we might want to bring up with SKOS | * Review of Issues we might want to bring up with SKOS | ||
Line 17: | Line 20: | ||
** Status | ** Status | ||
** What else? | ** What else? | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Consensus:''' Joe will write up the discussion on versioning, for the SKOS list, as well as something shorter for the other two topics. | ||
* Review current status of Registry progress | * Review current status of Registry progress |
Latest revision as of 11:43, 24 May 2006
Agenda and Notes, May 24, 2006
- Differences between Metadata Schemas and Application Profiles:
- Metadata Schemas are sets of terms and definitions thereof (like a vocabulary)
- Application Profiles use terms from schemas, and descriptions of usage, without being able to change definitions or create new terms
- AP has no control over the governance of the schema used
- Review UB meeting progress. Questions:
- Should we move ahead to specify vocabularies/properties for Metadata Schemas and Application Profiles (using our best guess of UB will come up with)?
- Should we then register these properties as ours, and prepare to crosswalk to the UB set when that becomes possible? What's the downside of doing this?
- If we don't do this, what are our options for continuing to develop the Registry?
- Diane will distribute a spreadsheet suggesting some properties we might register
- Aren't we just creating an application profile of an application profile? (for which we'll need repeatability)
Consensus: We will register the first three (agents, top level vocabs, vocabulary extras) and see whether Tom is okay with us being the bleeding edge.
- Review of Issues we might want to bring up with SKOS
- Our versioning policy? (as discussed in Seattle, but not really written up very well yet)
- Sources of definitions?
- Status
- What else?
Consensus: Joe will write up the discussion on versioning, for the SKOS list, as well as something shorter for the other two topics.
- Review current status of Registry progress
- Review Timetables and deliverables for the remainder of the summer