Difference between revisions of "National Leadership Grants--IMLS"

From Metadata-Registry
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==NOTES==
+
=Working Information=
  
Overall goal is to get IMLS to see this set of capabilities as a fundamental piece of the evolving world of distributed metadata and aggregations.  Builds on certain premises: substantial work has been done, research has been done and has been tested in a particular environment. It has more general utility.  This is about generalizing the tool, and completing the work, distribution, documentation,etc.
+
==Meeting and Telecon AGENDAS & NOTES==
  
Proposal will need to address:
+
[[12/12-13/05]] Meeting: Stuart, Diny, Diane & Jon (at Diane's house in Jacksonville)
  
What is generalization? How does the end result plug & play?
+
[[10/15/05]] Meeting: Stuart and Diane (at Diane's house in Jacksonville)
Where does UIUC IMLS fit in?  Even without that, it needs to demonstrate how it works.  GEM will be on instance (with or without the IMLS data)
+
 
+
Description of current components and where they are now
+
Where we want to get them by the end
+
Interactions with two repositories
+
 
+
Need match of 50% for more than $250,000
+
If GEM/IMLS, will have some money
+
If not leave at personnel expenses, some match with UW infrastructure
+
If we keep it under $250,000, only at 1/3 match
+
 
+
<b>Action item:</b> See if Cornell will give back a portion of overhead if we're not doing anything but setting up and administering grant? Diane will ask Tom about this.
+
 
+
<b>Action item:</b> Stuart will check and see if they accept appendices, so we can include screenshots
+
 
+
NOTES:
+
 
+
Need bulleted list about who could use this tool (including traditional libraries who have a digital library/institutional repository component)
+
 
+
JP: Need more information about components, and what they do specifically (functions), plus a statement about what's still needed, what needs to be reconceptualized based on experience.
+
Also:
+
#Check overview and conceptual framework docs for missing pieces, if you need more detail do it on another page, don't loose conciseness.
+
#Add bit about plugging into other user authentication systems
+
#What are the implementing technologies for each piece and what do you envision as a 'new' implementation environment.
+

Latest revision as of 12:59, 7 December 2005

Working Information

Meeting and Telecon AGENDAS & NOTES

12/12-13/05 Meeting: Stuart, Diny, Diane & Jon (at Diane's house in Jacksonville)

10/15/05 Meeting: Stuart and Diane (at Diane's house in Jacksonville)