Difference between revisions of "Nov. 16, 2006"

From Metadata-Registry
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
3. Review [http://metadataregistry.org/wiki/index.php/Step-By-Step_Instruction Draft Step-by-Step documentation]
 
3. Review [http://metadataregistry.org/wiki/index.php/Step-By-Step_Instruction Draft Step-by-Step documentation]
* Should we substitute this for the brief (and misleading) documentation on the front page?
+
* Should we substitute this for the brief (and somewhat misleading) documentation on the front page?
 
* What other pieces do we need, and who will do them?
 
* What other pieces do we need, and who will do them?
 
* Should we have some links to vocabulary development resources?
 
* Should we have some links to vocabulary development resources?
  
4. Diane has been invited to a workshop in the UK
+
4. Diane has been invited to a workshop in the UK (see http://dash.ecs.soton.ac.uk/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=documents:context_metadata_and_e-learning_a_literature_review
Diane mentioned that she will be in Seattle for ALA at the end of January, and suggested that as a good time for a project meeting.
+
the workshop wiki]) and would be happy to have any comments to take with her.

Revision as of 08:45, 16 November 2006

Agenda and Notes, Nov. 16, 2006

1. Review of Action Items from Nov. 1

  • Registry blog posts on activity at DC2006 (Jon & Joe)
  • Stuart will check with Ryan on getting a server set up so that Jon can set up a server. Jon will resend the mail with the correct versions. Jon wants to set up an intermediary that will route users to whichever server is up.
  • DC-Ed nomination of Sarah Currier, approval of new charter for community and revised web page (Diane--Done, pending web update and announcement from Makx, Diane sent pdfs to be linked for the meeting reports)
  • DC-Ed mailing list owner change (Stuart--done)

2. Update on discussions for new NSDL proposal

  • Stuart: discussions with Diny
  • Diane: meetings and discussions with Cornell Library staff
  • What are our next steps?

3. Review Draft Step-by-Step documentation

  • Should we substitute this for the brief (and somewhat misleading) documentation on the front page?
  • What other pieces do we need, and who will do them?
  • Should we have some links to vocabulary development resources?

4. Diane has been invited to a workshop in the UK (see http://dash.ecs.soton.ac.uk/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=documents:context_metadata_and_e-learning_a_literature_review the workshop wiki]) and would be happy to have any comments to take with her.