Difference between revisions of "Oct. 5, 2005"
From Metadata-Registry
(→Teleconference, Wednesday, Oct. 5, 2005) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
1. What do we need to get accomplished before and at our F2F meeting? From our Monday agenda: | 1. What do we need to get accomplished before and at our F2F meeting? From our Monday agenda: | ||
+ | ==Immediate next steps in preparation for meeting in Ithaca:== | ||
+ | * Completion of first iteration of draft Use Cases <b>Action item:</b> Agreed Diane will have initial iteration done by next Wed. meeting | ||
+ | |||
+ | We discussed briefly the new cases and whether adding/changing relationships should be broken out; decided it might be contextual. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* Begin work on RDF resource modeling | * Begin work on RDF resource modeling | ||
* Agent class (stemming from Use Cases) | * Agent class (stemming from Use Cases) | ||
Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
# Descriptive | # Descriptive | ||
# Administrative | # Administrative | ||
+ | |||
+ | F2F meeting: | ||
+ | #Roles for all parties defined better, so we can make best use of individual capabilities and skills | ||
+ | #Tasks and dependencies set up so that we don't get stymied by duelling priorities, etc. | ||
+ | #Determining what triggers a new version, also requirements for semantic understanding--what are the policy questions? The implications? | ||
+ | #Use cases are focusing on project start, but we should attempt to flesh out where we want to go second year (<b>Action item:</b> Stuart will add use cases for Application Profiles) |
Revision as of 11:46, 5 October 2005
Teleconference, Wednesday, Oct. 5, 2005
1. What do we need to get accomplished before and at our F2F meeting? From our Monday agenda:
Immediate next steps in preparation for meeting in Ithaca:
* Completion of first iteration of draft Use Cases Action item: Agreed Diane will have initial iteration done by next Wed. meeting
We discussed briefly the new cases and whether adding/changing relationships should be broken out; decided it might be contextual.
* Begin work on RDF resource modeling * Agent class (stemming from Use Cases) * Organizations * Maintainers * Registry Managers * System Administrator * Visitor * Registered User * Organization Contact * SKOS (working vocabulary representation) * Concept Schemes * Concepts # Descriptive # Administrative
F2F meeting:
- Roles for all parties defined better, so we can make best use of individual capabilities and skills
- Tasks and dependencies set up so that we don't get stymied by duelling priorities, etc.
- Determining what triggers a new version, also requirements for semantic understanding--what are the policy questions? The implications?
- Use cases are focusing on project start, but we should attempt to flesh out where we want to go second year (Action item: Stuart will add use cases for Application Profiles)