Difference between revisions of "Feb. 26, 2007"
From Metadata-Registry
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Agenda and Notes, Monday, Feb. 26, 2007=== | ===Agenda and Notes, Monday, Feb. 26, 2007=== | ||
| − | 1. | + | 1. Review of progress on proposals |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | 2. Letters of support--Extension? Do we need additional letters? | + | 2. Letters of support--who shall we ask? (New Proposal) |
| − | + | * Johannes Ruscheinski (iVia) | |
| − | + | * Diny, for GEM Exchange? | |
| + | * Bill Arms? | ||
| + | * NSDL projects and pathways using the sandbox? | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. Letters of support--Extension? Do we need additional letters? | ||
| + | * I have the name of the OCLC Terminology Services person who might be interested in working with us | ||
| + | * Tom Baker, both in his role as W3C WG chair, and as DCMI documentation guru? | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. Short discussion of what we intend to do in Barcelona, regarding registration of APs | ||
Revision as of 07:59, 26 February 2007
Agenda and Notes, Monday, Feb. 26, 2007
1. Review of progress on proposals
2. Letters of support--who shall we ask? (New Proposal)
- Johannes Ruscheinski (iVia)
- Diny, for GEM Exchange?
- Bill Arms?
- NSDL projects and pathways using the sandbox?
3. Letters of support--Extension? Do we need additional letters?
- I have the name of the OCLC Terminology Services person who might be interested in working with us
- Tom Baker, both in his role as W3C WG chair, and as DCMI documentation guru?
4. Short discussion of what we intend to do in Barcelona, regarding registration of APs
